Intel

Temperatures are forecasted to be hot hot hot for the next week. What is even hotter? Fresh off the press! Issue no.40 of Stockwoods Newsletter in Administrative & Regulatory Law *sizzle*. You can access it here.

In this issue, we provide you with cases from the Supreme Court of Canada and Divisional Court of Ontario on the following topics:

1. Correctness review for engagement, scope, and framework for Charter rights
2. Correctness Review for Constitutional Questions of Mixed Fact and Law
3. Irreparable Harm to Regulatory Body’s Duty Can Satisfy Test for Stay Pending Judicial Review
4. Doré Analysis Applies to Tweets Containing Misinformation
5. Leave to Appeal Determined Before Concurrent Judicial Review

Should you have any questions about the Newsletter, please feel free to contact the co-editors, Justin Safayeni or Spencer Bass, or another lawyer at Stockwoods LLP.

If you wish to unsubscribe from the mailing list, please contact Alice Chu at alicec@stockwoods.ca.

The weather has been unpredictable, one week we have warm sunny temperatures and the next snowy wintry conditions. Whatever the weather brings, the Stockwoods Newsletter will provide enlightenment in Administrative & Regulatory Law. You can access it here.

In this issue, we provide you with cases from the Supreme Court of Canada, Court of Appeal for Ontario and the Divisional Court on the following topics:

• Statutory appeal provisions do not limit judicial review on issues outside their scope
• Disguised Correctness Review for Cabinet Confidences?
• Limits of what can be challenged on a compliance application
• A request for bids is not subject to judicial review where there are adequate alternative remedies
• Lower courts lagging in considering Charter values in reasonableness review

Should you have any questions about the Newsletter, please feel free to contact the co-editors, Justin Safayeni or Spencer Bass, or another lawyer at Stockwoods LLP.

If you wish to unsubscribe from the mailing list, please contact Alice Chu at alicec@stockwoods.ca.

To round out 2023, just in time for the holidays and eggnogs, attached is our 38^th Issue of the Administrative & Regulatory Law Case Review. You can access it here. This issue explores cases from the Supreme Court of Canada, Alberta Court of Appeal, Divisional Court and Federal Court on the following topics:

• Reasonableness review requires responsive justification and reasons-first approach
• Robust conception of Doré framework is here to stay
• Constitutional questions regarding tribunal’s territorial jurisdiction reviewed for correctness
• Limited appeal rights and availability of judicial review
• Robust reasonableness review concludes regulations went beyond enabling legislation
• Decision-maker admits reasons were inadequate and gets to try again

Should you have any questions about the Newsletter, please feel free to contact the co-editors, Justin Safayeni or Spencer Bass, or another lawyer at Stockwoods LLP. Wishing everyone a wonderful holiday season and happy new year! If you wish to unsubscribe from the mailing list, please contact Alice Chu at alicec@stockwoods.ca

To start off your week, attached is our 37^th Issue of the Administrative & Regulatory Law Case Review. You can access it here. This issue explores cases from the Court of Appeal for Ontario, Federal Court of Appeal and the Divisional Court on the following topics:

• Media access to hearing recordings
• High bar for finding regulations unconstitutional due to vagueness or overbreadth
• Ministerial discretion in tension with the will of the legislature
• The limits of free expression for regulated professionals
• Failure to abide by statutory panel composition requirements or explain departure from them

Should you have any questions about the Newsletter, please feel free to contact the co-editors, Andrea Gonsalves or Justin Safayeni, or another lawyer at Stockwoods LLP.

If you wish to unsubscribe from the mailing list, please contact Alice Chu at alicec@stockwoods.ca.

Enjoy this little issue in a shaded patio with a sip of Sangria. You can access it here. This issue explores cases from the Court of Appeal for Ontario, the Federal Court of Appeal and the Divisional Court on the following topics:

• Reviewing courts will not save deficient Doré analysis
• Appointment of amicus to defend a decision
• Divisional Court improperly applied Reasonableness Standard by mischaracterizing Tribunal Decision
• Applicants bear substantial burden to add parties to a judicial review after the 30-day time limit

Should you have any questions about the Newsletter, please feel free to contact the co-editors, Andrea Gonsalves or Justin Safayeni, or another lawyer at Stockwoods LLP.

If you wish to unsubscribe from the mailing list, please contact Alice Chu at alicec@stockwoods.ca.