September 2019 Administrative and Regulatory Law Case Review

The September 2019 issue of the Stockwoods Administrative and Regulatory Law Case Review is now available. In this issue we discuss recent decisions from the Court of Appeal for Ontario, Divisional Court and the Federal Court on the following issues:

  • Imposed consultation creates reasonable apprehension of lack of independence
  • Generous approach to public interest standing in cases raising questions of law
  • Credibility, retrospectivity and the complications of mandatory revocation
  • Failure to reflect Charter values framework is fatal to reasonableness

Download a copy here.

Should you have any questions about the Newsletter, please feel free to contact the co-editors (Andrea Gonsalves and Justin Safayeni), or another lawyer at Stockwoods LLP.

Stockwoods client successful in Charter challenge to Ontario “Ag-gag” legislation

MARCH ISSUE OF THE STOCKWOODS ADMINISTRATIVE AND REGULATORY LAW CASE REVIEW

Stockwoods Recognized in Lexpert 2024

Ted Marrocco speaks to the Association of Business Immigration Lawyers about Privacy and Online Risk Management

Paul Le Vay, Brian Gover and Carlo di Carlo Recognized in List of Leading 500 Lawyers in Canada

RYANN ATKINS JOINS THE PARTNERSHIP AT STOCKWOODS

DECEMBER ISSUE OF THE STOCKWOODS ADMINISTRATIVE AND REGULATORY LAW CASE REVIEW 

Jury Returns Homicide Verdict in Soleiman Faqiri Inquest

STOCKWOODS PARTNERS SUCCESSFULLY APPEAL DEFAMATION JUDGMENT

Ted Marrocco discusses Digital Assets at the Ontario Bar Association

Andrea Gonsalves and Luisa Ritacca speak on Commissions Advocacy

Stockwoods partners participate in the OPD 18th Annual National Forum on Administrative Law and Practice

OCTOBER ISSUE OF THE STOCKWOODS ADMINISTRATIVE & REGULATORY LAW CASE REVIEW

Chambers Canada recognizes Stockwoods’ for professional excellence

Stockwoods listed in Best Lawyers Canada for 2024
- Find a Lawyer -