September 2019 Administrative and Regulatory Law Case Review

The September 2019 issue of the Stockwoods Administrative and Regulatory Law Case Review is now available. In this issue we discuss recent decisions from the Court of Appeal for Ontario, Divisional Court and the Federal Court on the following issues:

  • Imposed consultation creates reasonable apprehension of lack of independence
  • Generous approach to public interest standing in cases raising questions of law
  • Credibility, retrospectivity and the complications of mandatory revocation
  • Failure to reflect Charter values framework is fatal to reasonableness

Download a copy here.

Should you have any questions about the Newsletter, please feel free to contact the co-editors (Andrea Gonsalves and Justin Safayeni), or another lawyer at Stockwoods LLP.

Chambers Canada recognizes Stockwoods’ for professional excellence

Stockwoods listed in Best Lawyers Canada for 2024

JULY ISSUE OF THE STOCKWOODS ADMINISTRATIVE & REGULATORY LAW CASE REVIEW

Ted Marrocco speaks at the Toronto Lawyers Association “Top Tips for Advocates” series

Stockwoods Wins Multiple 2023 Benchmark Litigation Awards

Gerald Chan Elected LSO Regional Bencher

MARCH ISSUE OF THE STOCKWOODS ADMINISTRATIVE & REGULATORY LAW CASE REVIEW

Carlo Di Carlo quoted in Law360 Article

Vote Gerald Chan for Bencher

Stockwoods Partners recognized as “Stand-Out” Lawyers by Thomson Reuters

STOCKWOODS UPHOLDS STAY OF PROCEEDINGS IN $80 MILLION COMMERCIAL ACTION

JANUARY ISSUE OF THE STOCKWOODS ADMINISTRATIVE & REGULATORY LAW CASE REVIEW

Stephen Aylward joins the partnership at Stockwoods

Stockwoods successfully defends OSC quasi-criminal prosecution in CannTrust matter

Stockwoods listed as a Top Litigation Boutique for 2022 by Canadian Lawyer Magazine
- Find a Lawyer -