September 2019 Administrative and Regulatory Law Case Review

The September 2019 issue of the Stockwoods Administrative and Regulatory Law Case Review is now available. In this issue we discuss recent decisions from the Court of Appeal for Ontario, Divisional Court and the Federal Court on the following issues:

  • Imposed consultation creates reasonable apprehension of lack of independence
  • Generous approach to public interest standing in cases raising questions of law
  • Credibility, retrospectivity and the complications of mandatory revocation
  • Failure to reflect Charter values framework is fatal to reasonableness

Download a copy here.

Should you have any questions about the Newsletter, please feel free to contact the co-editors (Andrea Gonsalves and Justin Safayeni), or another lawyer at Stockwoods LLP.

Stockwoods lawyers successfully resist motion to lift a stay of proceedings

Gerald Chan Inducted into International Academy of Trial Lawyers 

Stockwoods lawyers successful at Supreme Court of Canada

JULY ISSUE OF THE STOCKWOODS ADMINISTRATIVE AND REGULATORY LAW CASE REVIEW

Stockwoods wins multiple Benchmark Awards

Adam Donaldson named one of York University’s Top 30 Alumni under 30

Five Stockwoods Lawyers listed as “Top 50 Trial Lawyers in Canada”

Benchmark Canada Listings 2024

Stockwoods client successful in Charter challenge to Ontario “Ag-gag” legislation

MARCH ISSUE OF THE STOCKWOODS ADMINISTRATIVE AND REGULATORY LAW CASE REVIEW

Stockwoods Recognized in Lexpert 2024

Ted Marrocco speaks to the Association of Business Immigration Lawyers about Privacy and Online Risk Management

Paul Le Vay, Brian Gover and Carlo di Carlo Recognized in List of Leading 500 Lawyers in Canada

RYANN ATKINS JOINS THE PARTNERSHIP AT STOCKWOODS

DECEMBER ISSUE OF THE STOCKWOODS ADMINISTRATIVE AND REGULATORY LAW CASE REVIEW 
- Find a Lawyer -