SEPTEMBER ISSUE OF THE STOCKWOODS ADMINISTRATIVE AND REGULATORY LAW CASE REVIEW

The Stockwoods Administrative and Regulatory Law Case Review fall issue is now available.  You can access it here.

This time, we offer you summaries and commentary on recent decisions from the Court of Appeal, Federal Court of Appeal and Divisional Court, dealing with the following issues:

  • Approach to reasonableness review after Vavilov
  • Vavilov, not Katz, applies to review of regulations
  • Reasonableness review where Tribunal distinguishes precedents
  • Zero-tolerance rule for sexual relationships between regulated health professionals and patients upheld
  • Decision to “jump” a joint submission on penalty upheld
  • Subsequent de novo process can cure serious procedural fairness flaws

Special thanks to Dragana Rakic for guest co-editing this issue.

Should you have any questions about the Newsletter, please feel free to contact the co-editors (Andrea Gonsalves or Justin Safayeni), or another lawyer at Stockwoods LLP. 

MARCH ISSUE OF THE STOCKWOODS ADMINISTRATIVE & REGULATORY LAW CASE REVIEW

Carlo Di Carlo quoted in Law360 Article

Vote Gerald Chan for Bencher

Stockwoods Partners recognized as “Stand-Out” Lawyers by Thomson Reuters

STOCKWOODS UPHOLDS STAY OF PROCEEDINGS IN $80 MILLION COMMERCIAL ACTION

JANUARY ISSUE OF THE STOCKWOODS ADMINISTRATIVE & REGULATORY LAW CASE REVIEW

Stephen Aylward joins the partnership at Stockwoods

Stockwoods successfully defends OSC quasi-criminal prosecution in CannTrust matter

Stockwoods listed as a Top Litigation Boutique for 2022 by Canadian Lawyer Magazine

Ted Marrocco to speak on law firm Cyber Security

Stockwoods listed as one of Canada’s best law firms by the Globe and Mail

STOCKWOODS LAWYERS WIN RARE APPEAL ON INTERIM CONTROL BY-LAWS

Stockwoods lawyers publish article on shareholder class actions and materiality

12 Stockwoods Lawyers Recognized in Best Lawyers 2023

JUNE ISSUE OF THE STOCKWOODS ADMINISTRATIVE & REGULATORY LAW CASE REVIEW
- Find a Lawyer -